PDA

View Full Version : Asking too much?


MikeCLovett
01-16-2004, 05:37 AM
I feel a sense of betrayal and perhaps this is unfair. I realise that HR have led me to expect a certain level of service and when this has not been realised (when I have needed it most), I feel betrayed.

I guess it is to HR's credit that I have such expectations. Clearly, I need to reassess my understanding of what HR can reasonably be expected to deliver.

I have a client with deadlines. A bonus to complete early, something I could have achieved, has been lost. I needed HR to provide me with a working SSL equipped server.

They failed.

Well... here is the story.

The server was eventually 'available' on Monday but ftp was not working correctly. I could log in fine but I could not see the usual HR account directory listing. After logging in I saw a blank.

This was fixed but I found I still could not upload files, create directories or any of those other rather essential items.

They suggested I use passive ftp. This I did and still received the same problem - "Permission Denied".

At this point the priority tickets I had raised vanished from my billing. So no charge, thanks HR... but I would rather have paid and had a fix. But I guess the time period had expired so you were being true to your word.

I raised another priority TT last night. I have had no reply.

I accept that I may need to do something at my end to make things work. However I have no difficulties with my other HR accounts. Nothing has changed at my end of things but I am ready to take advice... perhaps an SSL equipped semi-ded account has a slightly different ftp setup and thus the client needs adjustment.

If so do tell.

Alternatively perhaps the server settings for ftp are borked (as we say round here - 'knackered' is another good word). Perhaps HR should devote some time to finding out and indeed if this is a work in progress to tell me so.

In the meantime I will be looking for an alternative host. I need the server working for Monday. One way or another this will happen.

I have had one other problem which dragged out. I suspect that HR are very good at the run-of-the-mill typical problems. However anything out of the ordinary, anything that requires a bit more effort, more time, these kinds of problems are seemingly ignored.

Perhaps they are working on it. If so they could have told me. I suspect they would rather ignore it given their many other activities.

When I get back to my desk, my real desk... I will quote a TT.

Help?

Viper007Bond
01-16-2004, 09:41 AM
Dunno what to tell you, but...
Originally posted by MikeCLovett
Perhaps they are working on it. If so they could have told me. I've thought that many times.

MikeCLovett
01-16-2004, 06:01 PM
It has been fixed. Took too long for me sadly but it is done.

fac3less
01-16-2004, 07:30 PM
Let me know next time.. I have a spare server ..

(And nothing has ever not worked on it.. )

MikeCLovett
01-16-2004, 07:41 PM
That's good to know. Thank you. :)

MikeCLovett
01-17-2004, 04:58 PM
And now something else appears broke :(

Three steps forward, two steps back...

vanselus
01-19-2004, 10:19 PM
I would definitely recommend moving to a dedicated server if you haven't already - then you don't have to worry about somebody else crashing the server, and you always get priority support. The pricing is exceptional and IMHO anyone where uptime is critical should really be dedicated.

Although, I have to agree - quite often HR doesn't let you know when they're working on something until it's done.

fac3less
01-20-2004, 01:49 AM
After reading a few of Samrocket's messages..

I really can't tell whose telling the truth - because what he said makes lots of sense..

and I'm aware its probably just the fact that some people aren't using 'cache' or have odd cronjobs going..

but - no need to shut someone down instantly.

And espescially no reason to not give them their damn data back.

Tammy
01-20-2004, 03:47 AM
I have to agree with the dedicated server idea, especially if it is a mission critical situation.

MikeCLovett
01-20-2004, 05:25 AM
A dedicated server would be very nice but for many clients it is simply too expensive for their requirements.

And in truth it is the proverbial sledgehammer to crack a nut.

A semi-ded is quite adequate - more than adequate.

The problems that have occured most likely would have required HR input regardless of the account type in any case.

The clients needs are not 'mission critical' as such but in the UK there is always an upsurge in holiday bookings after Xmas. So he is very keen for the site to go live ASAP.

That is the source of the urgency rather than the nature of the application.

Rather surprisingly HR have been slow to react.

I am still very much an HR fan... it is disappointing that things have not gone as I had expected but hopefully now that the latest problem has been fixed (I have to test it but I have no reason to believe it is not fixed), I can make progress to get the site up and running.

Tammy
01-20-2004, 12:34 PM
I will tell you, I have been on a shared server all along with not problems, at least none that I know of. But if you seem to have problems, better to just upgrade and be done with it. More expensive for sure, sometimes the cost is worth it.

MikeCLovett
01-20-2004, 03:38 PM
Well as I tried to explain Tammy, in this case 'more' server would not have helped.

All is working now - it is just down to me to do my bit.